feat: refresh sources on a schedule
The feed was generated from checked-in fixtures and only moved when somebody captured a page by hand. This fetches. bun run refresh caches each page raw under snapshots/ and rebuilds the feed from what it cached; build-feed prefers a snapshot and falls back to the fixture, so a clean checkout and the container build stay offline and reproducible. The workflow runs it twice a day and commits only when a page's bytes actually changed — a 304, an identical body or a rejected parse all leave the tree clean — then dispatches ci.yml, which already knows how to test, build and deploy. Scraping conduct is enforced in code rather than left to good intentions: one request per source per cycle, a six-hour floor checked per source, conditional requests, a User-Agent with a contact URL, and robots.txt honoured — failing closed, because a permission we could not read is not a permission we have. No retries; a retry is a second request. A body that yields zero events is rejected and the previous snapshot kept, so a redesigned wiki shows up as a stale timestamp rather than an emptied calendar. One source down is a warning; all of them down fails the run, so a cycle that learned nothing is never committed. Tested entirely offline against an injected fetch and clock — no request has ever been made to a live wiki from this code. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
18b9652aed
commit
b085087b05
@@ -120,3 +120,9 @@ data/
|
||||
|
||||
# build output
|
||||
public/
|
||||
|
||||
# refresh bookkeeping (when we last checked a source).
|
||||
# The snapshots themselves ARE tracked — they are what the feed is built from —
|
||||
# but this file changes on every cycle, and committing it would mean a commit
|
||||
# per run saying nothing changed.
|
||||
snapshots/*.state.json
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user