docs(design): threads chosen for motifs in plates
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5.5
parent
09310ff254
commit
b511d67f4e
@@ -173,10 +173,21 @@ This file exists because of that request. It gets updated after every user messa
|
||||
hand-lettered part names for the picked theme. Known weak spot: A's faded labels on the 7-theme
|
||||
Cyclops plate are ~9px.
|
||||
|
||||
### 12. Motifs inside a plate: threads
|
||||
|
||||
> "Threads, definetly."
|
||||
|
||||
- **Chosen:** treatment **A, Threads under the sea**, for motifs inside a plate. B (pennants) and C
|
||||
(ink only) are deselected.
|
||||
- Known weak spot to fix when it is built for real: faded thread labels on busy plates (~9px on the
|
||||
7-theme Cyclops plate) need more room.
|
||||
- *(Claude's proposal)* The 2D sea chart is now 12 Vellum atlas with threads. Next open questions are
|
||||
the look of the whole and how the frieze/3D layers attach to this chart.
|
||||
|
||||
## Open questions (in priority order)
|
||||
|
||||
1. ~~Which sea-chart approach (08–11) reads best, or which mix?~~ 11's navigation + 10's style (§9).
|
||||
Now: how should motifs show inside a plate (12's toggle A/B/C)?
|
||||
Then A/B/C inside plates: **A threads** (§12).
|
||||
2. What is the look of the whole: frieze-led (terracotta and black), chart-led (parchment), or
|
||||
something in between? The user is "not sure" yet.
|
||||
3. How do 2D and 3D relate as products? Is the 3D the main experience with the chart inside it, while
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user