The carve-out was 180 words appended to LICENSE, which pushes the file below
the similarity threshold licence detectors match against — a repository whose
licence reads "other" is less inviting to a forker than one that reads MIT,
and the carve-out was never part of MIT's text anyway.
LICENSE is verbatim MIT again, plus three lines binding NOTICE into the terms
so the carve-out travels with any copy rather than being optional reading.
NOTICE carries the substance. README points at both.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The code is mine to license; the schedules under fixtures/ and snapshots/
were compiled by wiki editors and describe events run by the publishers, so
relicensing them under MIT would be claiming something I never held. A reader
who forks this needs to know the data does not come with it.
Kept as a note under the unmodified MIT text rather than woven into it, so
the license itself still reads verbatim.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
