The reader who was asked what good looks like named paimon.moe's timeline,
and the thing ours was missing is what that view never loses: on a wide
window we drew more calendar and nothing that said which day, whose game, or
which event was on screen. The date axis, the lane names and the event names
all scrolled away together — and a six-week bar starts weeks off the left
edge, so its name went with its start date and left a coloured rectangle.
So it is a pane that scrolls in both directions, with the axis stuck to the
top and every name stuck to the left. A name is sticky inside its own bar, so
it can never wander onto an event it does not belong to. The axis gained the
week the schedules are actually written in: a dated tick every Monday and a
brighter rule at each month.
The frozen label column that started this went away again — it stood on the
calendar and ate the names it was meant to keep. Lane names sit on their own
line instead, and "jump to today" sits in the board's header rather than
floating over the dates it sends you back to.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The reader who reported this had two games switched on, twenty-one live
events, and said the list stopped being usable — and every game added doubles
down on that. Each section now shows six rows with an explicit "show all N".
It truncates the view and nothing else. The slice comes off the front of a
list already in the order the reader chose, so the hidden rows keep their
place, stay counted in the header, and stay on the timeline. Expanding is
per-visit state: it is something you do while reading one list, not a
statement about how the app should work.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
`view` was component state, so a reader who preferred the timeline was put
back on the list by every reload — and which view opened at all had been
decided for them twice over: the PRD said calendar, the app shipped the list.
Neither was the reader's answer.
So the first run asks, and the tabs write to `prefs` from then on. The
question ships pre-answered with the list, because a reader cannot choose
between two layouts they have not seen and that is the one that answers "what
expires next" in a look — and each option is drawn rather than described, for
the same reason. The screen says where to change it afterwards, since the tabs
are small text in a corner.
Adds `view` to the prefs key space. Additive and defaulted, so an existing
reader's stored prefs open exactly where they did before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
A reader with two games switched on said the list lost its point at
twenty-one rows and asked for the three closest deadlines up front. One row
was also fragile on its own terms: ticking off the headline event left the
panel pointing at something the reader had no context for.
Three equal panels would be a stat grid, and a reader arrives with one
question — so the shape is one answer at full size and two follow-ups under
it, with no meter, summary or badges to turn the panel into a second copy of
the list below it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
New bawiki parser plus the ba-bawiki-events source, giving the game its
two live and upcoming events at day precision.
It reads the rendered /wiki/Events page, which is the opposite call to the
Fandom source next door and for the same kind of reason: bluearchive.wiki
is Miraheze, whose robots.txt disallows /w/ and /*?action=, so there the
API is the closed route and the page is the surface * is allowed. It
serves our own User-Agent a 200, sets no Content-Signal and no Crawl-delay
for us. The Fandom wiki was declined earlier as a JP archive yielding
nothing live; this is the live source that assessment pointed at.
Three page facts shape the parser, each a way to publish a confidently
wrong date. The schedule is a JP/Global tabber and the Japanese version
runs four to nine months ahead, so only Global is published — the akwiki
hazard. The Global tab's nav button carries the id
tabber-Global_version-label and precedes both panels, so slicing from the
first matching id reads the Japanese schedule while believing it read
ours; the first version of this parser did exactly that and published a
JP-only event. And three tabs on the page are named Global, the schedule
plus Mini-Event and Joint Firing Drill, so the schedule is found by its
Name (EN) header rather than by position, with canParse asserting the same
lookup — a renamed tab or column fails the run instead of emptying the
lane.
The page states no time of day and no timezone anywhere, which is why the
dates are day precision and why ba gets no resetOffsets. It also settles
the five other schedule tables, which do carry a wall clock but name no
zone and mostly do not say which server: reading those as UTC would invent
the fact that matters most, and rounding to a day would not save it,
because a 04:00 local boundary falls either side of UTC midnight depending
on the offset assumed and the start's day is part of the event ID. They
are left unparsed deliberately.
The two-event count is asserted against an independent extraction off the
fixture, and both starts corroborate against the per-event infoboxes
elsewhere on the page — GL 2026-08-04 and GL 2026-09-01, where the JP
reruns those tabs would have given are 2026-04-01 and 2026-05-06.
Three comment counts were already stale before this and are corrected to
what the tree now holds rather than to what it held yesterday.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
AGENTS.md now sends agents here to decide what to build next, which makes
a list where half the items have shipped actively misleading — P1a, three
of the games, the Timeline rename and custom events are all done, and
nothing here said so.
The thread reading stays fixed at the date it was made; only a status
table moves. Each item keeps its diagnosis, because those still hold —
what changed is whether anyone acted. Recording the not-dones is the point
as much as the dones: NextUp is still one row, the list still has no
expander, view is still component state, and those were the cheapest items
on the list.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The footer only spoke up past the two-day threshold, and then only as a
count of stale sources. A page silent about its own age reads as current,
so it now says when the data last refreshed on every load — absolute date
plus relative age, next to where the warning appears. This is the half of
PRD F7 that was never built.
Where the number comes from is the whole point. `freshness()` in
src/shared/feed.ts takes the newest lastSuccessAt and never generatedAt:
the feed is rebuilt on every deploy whether or not anything was refetched,
so a build stamp would report a calendar as minutes old while its events
came from a fixture captured months ago. A game is also only as fresh as
its oldest source, or Endfield's live wiki would vouch for its stalled
Game8 page. That matters concretely here — eight sources cannot be fetched
from CI at all, so this notice is what stands between a reader and a
confidently stale calendar.
The stale warning now names the lagging games and how far behind each is,
because a count is not something a reader can act on while a name tells
them which source page to check. Two exceptions found by rendering it
against the real feed: past four games it summarises the remainder, and
when every game is behind — what a refresh that stopped running looks like
— it collapses to one sentence rather than ten names repeating one age.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The guidance in here is not Claude-specific — it is what this project is,
what it refuses to do, and the rules that are invisible from the code. Any
agent working here needs it, and AGENTS.md is the name they all look for.
CLAUDE.md stays as a pointer so Claude Code still finds it, and holds no
guidance of its own; two copies would drift and the wrong one would be read.
Every cross-reference in the source comments, docs, workflow and skills now
names AGENTS.md, and the image ignores both.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Analysis of the 26-comment r/gachagaming thread from two days after the
first Pages deploy, with every claim checked against the tree at 6fc3c0b.
Two criticisms recur and only two: the game list is too short to be
anyone's tracker, and the design reads as unfinished. Nobody questioned a
single date, which is the thing most of this codebase's rules exist to
protect.
Recording it because the priority list it ends on is what the next
commits act on — P1c, more games, best-source-first, one commit each. The
saved thread it quotes is left untracked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
