The build log prints a count per source, and CI now declines to fail on
a page that states its own emptiness — which leaves that source showing
an unexplained 0, reading as exactly the fault the gate just decided it
was not. The zero we are content with is the one that has to say why.
It is also the only line that would ever prompt anyone to ask whether a
lane quiet for a month is a game between patches or a wiki that reworded
the sentence a statesNoEvents check is still matching. Nothing else in
the pipeline can tell those apart.
The test count in the layout block was stale at 898 and moves with these
two commits, so it is corrected here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Infinity Nikki's wiki prints "There are no Events in this category"
between versions, and the refresh runner has honoured that since
2026-09-03 — it stores the empty parse as the source's real answer
rather than letting a quiet lane reach the broken tier. The feed build
never asked, so the same page arrived at CI as parsedCount 0,
indistinguishable from a parser that has stopped reading a redesigned
page, and brokenSources failed every build while every refresh stayed
green.
The runner's verdict cannot travel on its own: only a parser has seen
the page, and by the time brokenSources runs there is nothing left but
the feed. So the fact rides on SourceHealth, defaulted so an older feed
the service worker cached keeps validating and reads as the strict
answer.
Both ends now ask it the same way — of an empty parse only, from the
page's own words only — because a redesign yields zero rows too, and
excusing that is the silently emptied calendar the gate exists for.
The rule sits in a module rather than in build-feed.ts, which writes
public/ and so runs a build if a test imports it. That is how the two
ends drifted apart with nothing to catch it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
CI failed on Infinity Nikki yielding no events, and was wrong to. Its
snapshot parses to six events; every one of them had ended by the morning
the build ran. The parser is fine — `--now 2026-08-14` gives six, today
gives none — and the page simply has nothing current left on it.
eventCount is counted after expired events are dropped, so "this parser has
stopped reading a redesigned page" and "this page's events have all
finished" arrived as the same zero. Only the first means our code is wrong,
and only the first should redden a build. So the feed now records what each
document yields parsed as of its own capture date, before expiry, and the
check fails on that instead.
Nikki cannot refresh itself out of this, either: docs/SOURCES.md records
that Fandom refuses the Actions runner. A lane with an empty calendar is a
real problem, but it is a refresh problem, so it is reported on the build
log and left visible rather than thrown.
parsedCount is nullable and defaulted, never required: the client validates
the whole feed with safeParse and the service worker serves the last feed it
downloaded, so a required field would have made every cached feed fail
validation and taken the offline promise with it. Null also covers a source
whose bytes were never confirmed live — there is no date to parse "as of",
and a build is not failed on missing information.
The rule moved to shared/feed.ts. A test did pin the old one, by grepping
the workflow for the string — which proved the check existed, never that it
was right.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The footer only spoke up past the two-day threshold, and then only as a
count of stale sources. A page silent about its own age reads as current,
so it now says when the data last refreshed on every load — absolute date
plus relative age, next to where the warning appears. This is the half of
PRD F7 that was never built.
Where the number comes from is the whole point. `freshness()` in
src/shared/feed.ts takes the newest lastSuccessAt and never generatedAt:
the feed is rebuilt on every deploy whether or not anything was refetched,
so a build stamp would report a calendar as minutes old while its events
came from a fixture captured months ago. A game is also only as fresh as
its oldest source, or Endfield's live wiki would vouch for its stalled
Game8 page. That matters concretely here — eight sources cannot be fetched
from CI at all, so this notice is what stands between a reader and a
confidently stale calendar.
The stale warning now names the lagging games and how far behind each is,
because a count is not something a reader can act on while a name tells
them which source page to check. Two exceptions found by rendering it
against the real feed: past four games it summarises the remainder, and
when every game is behind — what a refresh that stopped running looks like
— it collapses to one sentence rather than ten names repeating one age.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
