The section header said "next after this ends in {live[1]}", which got the
question wrong in both of the ways lens.ts exists to prevent.
An event whose end was never announced has no time remaining, and the `?? 0`
that stood in for it made `formatRemaining` return its expiry string — so a
second row with `endsAt: null` had the header reading "next after this ends in
ended". That is the one rule this product is built on, inverted: an unknown end
announced as an expiry.
And `live[1]` is the second *row*, not the second deadline. The list is sorted
by whatever mode the reader picked, so under "doing first" the header named
whatever they were second-most partway through — the same mistake firstToExpire
was written to keep out of the headline, one row further down.
`followingDeadlineMs` asks the deadlines instead and returns null when there is
no second dated end, and the header then says nothing at all.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The headline panel asked for one row and got one row, so nothing else could
ask this question. `nextToExpire` answers it for any count and `firstToExpire`
is now that function asked for one — one definition, so a big countdown and the
lines under it can never disagree about which deadline is next.
Unannounced ends still sort behind every dated one however long they have been
running: a panel of deadlines that leads with "unknown" is not a panel of
deadlines. It sorts a copy, because the array it is handed is the one the list
on screen is rendering from.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Switching games on and off says which games you play, and is set once.
It's the wrong tool for what a player of four games does while reading —
clear one game, move to the next — which cost two taps per game and left
the settings panel no longer describing what they play.
Focus is a lens over that filter, not a second filter: a bar at the top,
above everything it narrows, with a "next game" control that steps
through and ends by returning to all. It never touches hiddenGames, and
a focus on a game since switched off is ignored rather than obeyed, so
it can't strand you on a blank page whose cause is elsewhere. Each chip
carries that game's outstanding count, so a game with nothing waiting
says so before you visit it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Two symptoms of one bug. The "next to expire" headline counted events
the reader had marked done or ignored, and the dailies strip kept a
tickable chip for a repeating event they had already finished.
showCompleted and showIgnored decide what a reader can *look at*. The
headline and the strip are *instructions*, so they answer a different
question — what is still on your plate — and both now go through one
`outstanding` lens.
Also fixes a second bug in the same line: `next` took the head of the
list, which under "doing first" sorting is whatever you're partway
through, not the soonest deadline. It reads the minimum now.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
