Adds the r1999 GameId and its metadata, plus GameMeta.resetHourLocal for
the fact that makes it unlike every other game here: it rolls its day at
05:00 server time rather than 04:00, on a single global UTC-5 server, so
its day-key boundary is 10:00 UTC.
resetOffsets could not carry that. Landing 10:00 UTC through the offset
would mean claiming a UTC-6 server, and serverOffsetUtc answers more
questions than this one. The new field overrides RESET_HOUR_LOCAL per game
and is absent everywhere else, so no existing reader's logged day moved —
a test pins that for the games that already had readers.
Both facts are read off the source, not assumed: all 154 rows of the
wiki's event list state (UTC-5) and run 05:00 to 04:59, an event ending
one minute before the reset the next one begins on.
No adapter yet, so the game has no events until one lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Endfield has two server groups, not three: Europe is served off the
Americas machine on a fixed UTC-5, so a European player's day rolls at
09:00 UTC. We were resetting it six hours early, at 03:00, which ticked
the wrong box every morning between those two instants.
Adds GameMeta.resetOffsets, a sparse per-region override, and threads an
optional `game` through every day-key function. Per region rather than
per game on purpose: a blanket offset would drag Asia — which does have
its own Endfield server — onto the Americas clock, moving day keys for
readers who never had the bug. A regression test pins Asia's output as
identical to before.
Day keys are localStorage keys, so this re-labels ticks logged between
03:00 and 09:00 UTC by European Endfield players, one day backward. No
tick is deleted and past days stay editable, but a streak can read as
broken for a day. That is the cost of correcting a wrong reset; leaving
it wrong is worse.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Guessing from a source's wording is right most of the time, and someone
who finds it wrong often enough should be able to stop it rather than
dismiss the same false positive every patch.
Off, only events the reader marked themselves get a checklist. It
silences the guess rather than deleting anything: overrides, ticks and
streaks all survive, so switching it back on restores exactly what was
there. With it off, marking an event stores an explicit yes, since there
is no longer a detection for an override to agree with.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Dailiness was read off the source's wording alone, which is wrong in both
directions: a grind that resets every day but whose page never prints
"daily" got no checklist, and a banner whose blurb mentions "daily login
rewards" got one nobody could dismiss.
The reader's answer now wins. The control sits exactly where the
checklist goes — the one place the answer visibly matters — so marking an
event and ticking today off are the same gesture in the same place.
An override is stored only when it disagrees with detection. Recording
agreement would freeze today's guess into the reader's own data, so a
later parser improvement could never reach that event.
Marked events also join today's dailies at the top of the page, beside
the per-game chores: at 23:50 a login campaign and a commission run are
the same job, and ticking one should not mean opening a sheet to find its
checklist.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
A login campaign is not one job with a deadline. It is twenty small jobs
on twenty separate deadlines, and a day you miss is gone whatever you do
afterwards — which a single "done" tick cannot express.
Repeating events now get a checklist: today's tick, a strip of every day
in the run showing what you got and what you missed, the streak, and how
many chances are left. Past days stay editable, because people tick up
later and a checklist you cannot correct stops being trusted after the
first mistake. Alongside it sits today's dailies — commissions, sanity,
daily training — one tick per game, keyed `dailies:<game>`, since no
source publishes those and they are the only thing on the page that
expires tonight rather than next patch.
Days roll at 04:00 server time per region, not midnight: finishing at
02:00 is still yesterday, and a naive UTC date would tick the wrong box
for four hours every night.
Dailiness is read off what the source published — a login event type, or
"daily"/"check-in"/"7-day" wording — never from a game's habits or an
event's length. That adds no schema field, so the feed contract and every
event ID are untouched. An unannounced end yields a tick count, not a
checklist of invented length, and a tick is never removed except by the
reader, including ticks outside the window the feed now claims: a source
quietly moving a date must not erase a fortnight's streak that exists
nowhere else.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
