`view` was component state, so a reader who preferred the timeline was put
back on the list by every reload — and which view opened at all had been
decided for them twice over: the PRD said calendar, the app shipped the list.
Neither was the reader's answer.
So the first run asks, and the tabs write to `prefs` from then on. The
question ships pre-answered with the list, because a reader cannot choose
between two layouts they have not seen and that is the one that answers "what
expires next" in a look — and each option is drawn rather than described, for
the same reason. The screen says where to change it afterwards, since the tabs
are small text in a corner.
Adds `view` to the prefs key space. Additive and defaulted, so an existing
reader's stored prefs open exactly where they did before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
New bawiki parser plus the ba-bawiki-events source, giving the game its
two live and upcoming events at day precision.
It reads the rendered /wiki/Events page, which is the opposite call to the
Fandom source next door and for the same kind of reason: bluearchive.wiki
is Miraheze, whose robots.txt disallows /w/ and /*?action=, so there the
API is the closed route and the page is the surface * is allowed. It
serves our own User-Agent a 200, sets no Content-Signal and no Crawl-delay
for us. The Fandom wiki was declined earlier as a JP archive yielding
nothing live; this is the live source that assessment pointed at.
Three page facts shape the parser, each a way to publish a confidently
wrong date. The schedule is a JP/Global tabber and the Japanese version
runs four to nine months ahead, so only Global is published — the akwiki
hazard. The Global tab's nav button carries the id
tabber-Global_version-label and precedes both panels, so slicing from the
first matching id reads the Japanese schedule while believing it read
ours; the first version of this parser did exactly that and published a
JP-only event. And three tabs on the page are named Global, the schedule
plus Mini-Event and Joint Firing Drill, so the schedule is found by its
Name (EN) header rather than by position, with canParse asserting the same
lookup — a renamed tab or column fails the run instead of emptying the
lane.
The page states no time of day and no timezone anywhere, which is why the
dates are day precision and why ba gets no resetOffsets. It also settles
the five other schedule tables, which do carry a wall clock but name no
zone and mostly do not say which server: reading those as UTC would invent
the fact that matters most, and rounding to a day would not save it,
because a 04:00 local boundary falls either side of UTC midnight depending
on the offset assumed and the start's day is part of the event ID. They
are left unparsed deliberately.
The two-event count is asserted against an independent extraction off the
fixture, and both starts corroborate against the per-event infoboxes
elsewhere on the page — GL 2026-08-04 and GL 2026-09-01, where the JP
reruns those tabs would have given are 2026-04-01 and 2026-05-06.
Three comment counts were already stale before this and are corrected to
what the tree now holds rather than to what it held yesterday.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Nothing a reader marks, types or ticks ever leaves their browser, so there is no
account and no server-side record to look anything up in after a report arrives.
Whatever the form captured is all there will ever be — which is the argument for
structured forms over a blank box, and for the bug form carrying the footer's
"event data last refreshed" line as a prefill. A stale calendar and a genuinely
wrong parse are indistinguishable from outside, eight sources cannot be fetched
from CI at all, and that line is the only thing that separates the two cases.
The feature form states the three constraints up front, because "sync across my
devices" and "have a model read the page" both have settled answers and a reader
deserves them before typing rather than after. It also points source requests at
the assessed-and-declined table: the loudest feedback on the first release was
that the game list is too short, so that is the request that arrives most, and a
wiki that forbids automated access or only archives finished events cannot be
used no matter how often it is asked for.
Blank issues stay enabled. A form that turns someone away loses the report, not
the noise.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The working tree is shared. An agent that reaches for `git add -A` sweeps up
whatever the user or another agent left there and signs it, which puts work in
the log nobody reviewed and breaks the one-coherent-change rule right below it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The footer only spoke up past the two-day threshold, and then only as a
count of stale sources. A page silent about its own age reads as current,
so it now says when the data last refreshed on every load — absolute date
plus relative age, next to where the warning appears. This is the half of
PRD F7 that was never built.
Where the number comes from is the whole point. `freshness()` in
src/shared/feed.ts takes the newest lastSuccessAt and never generatedAt:
the feed is rebuilt on every deploy whether or not anything was refetched,
so a build stamp would report a calendar as minutes old while its events
came from a fixture captured months ago. A game is also only as fresh as
its oldest source, or Endfield's live wiki would vouch for its stalled
Game8 page. That matters concretely here — eight sources cannot be fetched
from CI at all, so this notice is what stands between a reader and a
confidently stale calendar.
The stale warning now names the lagging games and how far behind each is,
because a count is not something a reader can act on while a name tells
them which source page to check. Two exceptions found by rendering it
against the real feed: past four games it summarises the remainder, and
when every game is behind — what a refresh that stopped running looks like
— it collapses to one sentence rather than ten names repeating one age.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Each of these was true when written and stopped being true when a source
landed. dates.ts holds ten formats, not nine; INGESTION says Game8 uses
"at least four page templates" directly above a list of seven; its testing
note still credits "both current adapters" when there are eleven; PRD
lists the seven launch games against ten in GameId. AGENTS also missed
fandom from the parsers-are-keyed-by-site bullet and build-static.ts from
the tree, which matters because another section leans on the latter.
The PRD table stays as launch scope rather than becoming a roster to keep
in sync — GameId is named as the live answer instead, which is the same
move that keeps this drift from recurring. Its no-schema-change claim is
sharpened to name GachaEvent, because Reverse: 1999 did add a field:
resetHourLocal, to game metadata, which moves no stored key. The claim as
written read as false against a commit that plainly added one.
Also draws sanitize into the stage diagram as 2.5. It runs on every source
without the pipeline arranging it, which is exactly why it kept being
absent from the picture.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Self-containment was a clause on the end of the commit-straight-to-main
bullet and covered only half of what it should: one coherent change,
green on its own. Nothing said how to split a change that spans layers,
and nothing at all said what the message should contain.
Both halves are now stated. Splitting goes model → store → UI → docs with
each step green by itself, even where that means widening a type in the
model commit that only the UI commit uses — and docs/FEEDBACK.md already
makes the same argument for adapters, so it is cited rather than repeated.
Succinct is about the message: a one-line subject and a body saying why,
which a diff cannot show, rather than a list of files it can. The
no-stray-reformatting line is there because a formatter this project does
not run once buried a 100-line change in a 550-line diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
AGENTS.md cited three of the five docs in passing and never said to read
one. An agent could therefore repair a rule it had just rediscovered the
expensive way, which is how ARCHITECTURE.md came to describe a tree eleven
files out of date without anyone noticing.
So: a table of what each doc settles and what to read it before, plus the
two rules that follow. The docs are part of the change, because they hold
the only record of *why* and a false sentence there costs the next reader
the whole argument rather than a detail. And a disagreement between this
file and a doc is a bug to report — this file summarises, the doc holds the
reasoning, so neither silently wins and the wrong one gets fixed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
bluearchive.fandom.com/wiki/Event/Event_List fetches and parses cleanly,
so the reason to decline it is not obvious from trying it: every one of its
88 rows is JP-server history, the newest ending 2026-02-18, so it yields
zero live or upcoming events. That reads as an empty lane plus a
permanently rejected snapshot, since the runner rejects a body parsing to
nothing — a failure mode worth naming in the assessment table, because
"clean table, no error" invites writing the adapter first.
bluearchive.wiki is the live alternative and stays unbuilt for now: it is
Miraheze, its robots closes the API route we used for Fandom, and it lists
JP and Global in separate tables — the akwiki hazard, which wants settling
before a line is written rather than after.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
New `fandom` parser plus the r1999-fandom-events source, giving the game
six live and upcoming events at exact precision.
It fetches api.php?action=parse, not /wiki/Events. The rendered page
answers a non-browser client with a Cloudflare challenge, and getting past
that would be defeating an access control — the reason uma.moe was
declined. The wiki's robots.txt instead allows /api.php?action= for *, and
that endpoint serves our real User-Agent a 200, so this reads the
sanctioned surface with our own headers and no impersonation. The body is
therefore JSON, which is what canParse checks first: a challenge page or
an error payload must fail loudly, not parse to zero events.
Two page facts shape the parser. Titles come from each row's <b>, because
a missing banner image renders as a red link reading "File:<Event>
Banner.png" that a cell-text reader would publish as the event name. And
the page is an archive of 154 rows since v1.1 with no ongoing section to
gate on, so inclusion is decided against ctx.now — the six-event count is
asserted against an independent extraction off the fixture, per
docs/INGESTION.md § Testing.
Because robots.txt is unreadable from a challenged address, the gate fails
closed in CI and the source is skipped there — a warning, not a broken
build. Refreshing it means running `bun run refresh` from an address
Fandom serves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Adds the r1999 GameId and its metadata, plus GameMeta.resetHourLocal for
the fact that makes it unlike every other game here: it rolls its day at
05:00 server time rather than 04:00, on a single global UTC-5 server, so
its day-key boundary is 10:00 UTC.
resetOffsets could not carry that. Landing 10:00 UTC through the offset
would mean claiming a UTC-6 server, and serverOffsetUtc answers more
questions than this one. The new field overrides RESET_HOUR_LOCAL per game
and is absent everywhere else, so no existing reader's logged day moved —
a test pins that for the games that already had readers.
Both facts are read off the source, not assumed: all 154 rows of the
wiki's event list state (UTC-5) and run 05:00 to 04:59, an event ending
one minute before the reset the next one begins on.
No adapter yet, so the game has no events until one lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
The guidance in here is not Claude-specific — it is what this project is,
what it refuses to do, and the rules that are invisible from the code. Any
agent working here needs it, and AGENTS.md is the name they all look for.
CLAUDE.md stays as a pointer so Claude Code still finds it, and holds no
guidance of its own; two copies would drift and the wrong one would be read.
Every cross-reference in the source comments, docs, workflow and skills now
names AGENTS.md, and the image ignores both.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
